Originally Posted by
ryan roopnarine
ok, this is getting annoying. if my car had chf 7.1 in it originally, i might feel different. also, i have to agree with ross--if you fix your leaks, the cost is moot. that having been said....
nothing posted here indicates that atf will f' up will mess up a non lad 7.1 system. the pentosin document says theirself that the issue is with putting 7.1 into 11 and vice versa. miscible is a very specific chemistry term. it does not mean that the fluid will destroy anything, it just means that the 11 and 7 will not combine, most likely the 11 will float on top of the 7.1 and appear to look like a different "phase". it is quite telling that pentosin would tell people that it isn't ok to mix the two fluids, but it is ok in a pinch, and that it is ok to do so if you completely flush the system--but that mixing them produces "floucculent". it is hydraulic fluid, it is going to get into everything, but a cursory flush makes it ok? chf stands for central hydraulic fluid, mineral (for 7.1). atf is a hydraulic fluid. pentosin isn't going to be the group to ask for the suitability of mixing the two, zaharand-fabriken (sp?) is, but nobody has bothered to ask them in any of this. i wouldn't ask valvoline if their transmission fluid is suitable first, i'd ask the vehicle manufacturer/transmission manufacturer first. i've had atf in my 7.1 capped vehicle for in excess of 100k miles and the only issue that has resulted is a dead spot on center that has more to do with the age of the vehicle than of the fluid running through the system.
I'm going to ask ZF then.
2008 audi A3 1.9tdi
(former 1991 520i LPG)