I think there are a few...Originally Posted by Stefan Borch
I have not compared the sensors used by those DME's but if it uses the same air flow meter part number, coolant temp sensor and flywheel sensors are in the same position, it's worth a try.My M30 runs the 150 DME and I would like to add a performance chip, but they are hard to come by for this build. I did try a US chip, but it had no effect on my European car...
I have found a lot of postings from people considering the swap, but I was unable to find anything about the results of the swap, except a quick report on improved idle.
Specs:
E32 735iA (yes, I know this is an E34 board, but I do believe it is of no importance in this case)
Build date 10/1986
NO O2 sensor or catalyst! Meaning 220bhp and 9.2:1 compression ratio vs. 9.0:1 standard (or so I have read)
1267355344 chip in 150 DME
1. Does anyone KNOW what will happen, if I upgrade my 150 to a 179? Will the ignition timing and/or the fuel mixture be all wrong? Or will something else go askew?
The small change from 9.0:1 to 9.2:1 should not be a problem.
2. Will the higher compression make a difference on the ignition timing and so on, thus creating problems with a changed DME even without the chipping?
Probably not.
3. The other way around: Will the higher compression ratio make a difference on the ignition timing and so on, thus creating problems with a changed CHIP in the original DME?
Because in that old DME, the chip has 3 or 4 maps for leaded and unleaded fuel. The map in use is selected by a coding plug. The chip you bought for a US spec car would only have the map for premium unleaded (with cat) modified, while your car is using the maps for leaded and no O2 sensor.
4. Does anyone KNOW why the US performance chips has little or no effect on European cars, even though they are replacing the identically numbered chip in the same DME version?
Regards,
Stefan
Mark